SPORTACCORD 2024 INSIGHTS: Sport’s Perfect Storm
23 May 2024 14:34
Michael Jordan’s file against Chinese sportswear company Qiaodan was tried for the second time on Monday in Beijing High People’s Court. This happened after Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court dismissed Michael Jordan’s claims in February.
The Monday trial reached no verdict.
Michael Jordan has been suing since 2012, and has filed 34 suits, two of which were filed by Nike. He accused Qiaodan illegally using his name in its trademarks as most people would think of Jordan himself when hearing the name of the brand.
Qiaodan company argued that the brand had been around for 20 years and was a famous domestic brand which had little resemblance with the image of Nike’s Jordan Brand. Furthermore, the English name Jordan should be translated into Chinese as “Qiaodeng”.
In 2001, the Jinjiang-based Qiaodan company registered trademarks such as “QIAODAN”, “XIAOQIAODAN” (literally little Jordan) AND “QIAODAN WANG” (literally Jordan King) at the Trademark Office of China.
Source: Global Times, etc.
Related coverage
Qiaodan won the case but stopped the progress
19 May 2015
Qiaodan Sports sues Nike for trademark infringement
14 Mar 2018
Qiaodan Sports sponsors Chinese delegation for 28th Winter Universiade
09 Jan 2017
Qiaodan becomes the only equipment supplier of FISU
23 Sep 2016
Jordan failed in the second trial against Qiaodan
12 May 2015
More from Yutang Sports
Interview with Andreas Zagklis: to keep popularization of basketball with all-round strategy
08 Jul 2024
SPORTACCORD 2024 INSIGHTS: Major Technology Trends Shaping Sports Sector
03 Jun 2024
SPORTACCORD 2024 INSIGHTS: Touchdowns, Home Runs and Slam Dunks
12 Jun 2024
Interview with Yiannis Exarchos: to narrate Olympic story in new ways and promote positive values
01 Jul 2024
Expert insight | New changes on UEFA EUROs: growing maturity of Hisense and other Chinese brands
22 Jul 2024
Yutang Sports
loading...